Pentium N3540 vs Pentium J2900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pentium J2900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
0.81
+3.8%
Pentium N3540
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
0.78

Pentium J2900 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24752506
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years ago)22 May 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$94$251
Current price$559 (5.9x MSRP)$404 (1.6x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz2.66 GHz
L1 cache224 KB224 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
SIPP-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Smart Connectno data+
FDI-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s21.32 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency896 MHz896 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.211.2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revision3.0 and 2.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Number of USB ports55

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium J2900 0.81
+3.8%
Pentium N3540 0.78

Pentium J2900 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium J2900 1253
+3.6%
Pentium N3540 1209

Pentium J2900 outperforms Pentium N3540 by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.81 0.78
Recency 1 November 2013 22 May 2014
Cost $94 $251
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium J2900 and Pentium N3540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium J2900
Pentium J2900
Intel Pentium N3540
Pentium N3540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 69 votes

Rate Pentium J2900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 460 votes

Rate Pentium N3540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium J2900 or Pentium N3540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.