Microsoft SQ1 vs Pentium III 933
Primary details
Comparing Pentium III 933 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1483 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.12 |
| Architecture codename | Coppermine T (2000) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium III 933 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.93 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 80 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 44 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium III 933 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 370 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Pentium III 933 has 11011.1% lower power consumption.
Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium III 933 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium III 933 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium III 933 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
