Xeon E5-2603 v4 vs Pentium Gold G5420
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2603 v4 outperforms Pentium Gold G5420 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Gold G5420 and Xeon E5-2603 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1740 | 1600 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.14 | 3.73 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Intel Pentium Gold | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Broadwell (2014−2019) |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | $213 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Pentium Gold G5420 has 252% better value for money than Xeon E5-2603 v4.
Detailed specifications
Pentium Gold G5420 and Xeon E5-2603 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | QPI |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 2 × 6.4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 17 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 15 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | 246.24 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 73 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Gold G5420 and Xeon E5-2603 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Gold G5420 and Xeon E5-2603 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium Gold G5420 and Xeon E5-2603 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Gold G5420 and Xeon E5-2603 v4 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Gold G5420 and Xeon E5-2603 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 1,536 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Gold G5420 and Xeon E5-2603 v4.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 40 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.40 | 3.04 |
| Recency | 23 April 2019 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 85 Watt |
Pentium Gold G5420 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 57.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2603 v4, on the other hand, has a 26.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
The Xeon E5-2603 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Gold G5420 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium Gold G5420 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2603 v4 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Gold G5420 and Xeon E5-2603 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
