i7-620M vs Pentium G860

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G860
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.95
Core i7-620M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.28
+34.7%

i7-620M outperforms Pentium G860 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G860 and Core i7-620M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24832265
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.12no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium (Desktop)Intel Core i7
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date15 September 2011 (13 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$332

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G860 and Core i7-620M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C105 °C
Number of transistors504 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G860 and Core i7-620M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G860 and Core i7-620M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Pentium G860 and Core i7-620M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G860 and Core i7-620M are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G860 and Core i7-620M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz766 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G860 and Core i7-620M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G860 and Core i7-620M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G860 0.95
i7-620M 1.28
+34.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G860 1459
i7-620M 1979
+35.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium G860 422
i7-620M 440
+4.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium G860 701
i7-620M 814
+16.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium G860 3964
+14.1%
i7-620M 3473

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium G860 7695
+0.5%
i7-620M 7657

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium G860 3065
+0.7%
i7-620M 3044

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium G860 23.6
i7-620M 18
+31.1%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Pentium G860 2
i7-620M 2
+3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 1.28
Recency 15 September 2011 7 January 2010
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Pentium G860 has an age advantage of 1 year.

i7-620M, on the other hand, has a 34.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-620M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G860 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G860 is a desktop processor while Core i7-620M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G860 and Core i7-620M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G860
Pentium G860
Intel Core i7-620M
Core i7-620M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 163 votes

Rate Pentium G860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 292 votes

Rate Core i7-620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G860 or Core i7-620M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.