EPYC 7532 vs Pentium G6960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G6960
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.82
EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
28.98
+3434%

EPYC 7532 outperforms Pentium G6960 by a whopping 3434% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2872205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.476.11
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date9 January 2011 (15 years ago)19 February 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Pentium G6960 and EPYC 7532: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.93 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache3072 KB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G6960 and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G6960 and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium G6960 and EPYC 7532 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G6960 and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G6960 and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16.38 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G6960 and EPYC 7532 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G6960 and EPYC 7532.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium G6960 0.82
EPYC 7532 28.98
+3434%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium G6960 1433
Samples: 20
EPYC 7532 50765
+3443%
Samples: 47

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium G6960 459
EPYC 7532 1148
+150%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium G6960 814
EPYC 7532 10001
+1129%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 28.98
Recency 9 January 2011 19 February 2020
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 200 Watt

Pentium G6960 has 174% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has a 3434% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 357% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7532 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium G6960 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G6960 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7532 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Pentium G6960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 33 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium G6960 and EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.