Xeon E-2436 vs Pentium G6951

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G6951
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.87
Xeon E-2436
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
14.16
+1528%

Xeon E-2436 outperforms Pentium G6951 by a whopping 1528% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G6951 and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2552512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.1298.50
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.1320.62
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2010 (14 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$94$331

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2436 has 8695% better value for money than Pentium G6951.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G6951 and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G6951 and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G6951 and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Pentium G6951 and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G6951 and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G6951 and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16.38 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDN/A

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G6951 and Xeon E-2436 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G6951 and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe version2.05
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G6951 0.87
Xeon E-2436 14.16
+1528%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G6951 1383
Xeon E-2436 22487
+1526%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 14.16
Recency 1 September 2010 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E-2436 has a 1527.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2436 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G6951 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G6951 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2436 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G6951 and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G6951
Pentium G6951
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Pentium G6951 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G6951 or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.