Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Pentium G6950

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2488not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Manchester (2005−2006)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)December 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60$309
Current price$203 (3.4x MSRP)$119 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256K
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size81 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156939
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium G6950 1238
+72.9%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 716

Pentium G6950 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4200+ by 73% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium G6950 299
+82.3%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 164

Pentium G6950 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4200+ by 82% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium G6950 515
+85.3%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 278

Pentium G6950 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4200+ by 85% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Cost $60 $309
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 89 Watt

We couldn't decide between Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G6950 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G6950
Pentium G6950
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Athlon 64 X2 4200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 45 votes

Rate Pentium G6950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 140 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G6950 or Athlon 64 X2 4200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.