Xeon E-2456 vs Pentium G645T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G645T
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.80
Xeon E-2456
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
15.40
+1825%

Xeon E-2456 outperforms Pentium G645T by a whopping 1825% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G645T and Xeon E-2456 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2599455
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date2 September 2012 (12 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium G645T and Xeon E-2456 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size131 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G645T and Xeon E-2456 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G645T and Xeon E-2456. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Pentium G645T and Xeon E-2456 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G645T and Xeon E-2456 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G645T and Xeon E-2456. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G645T and Xeon E-2456 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G645T and Xeon E-2456.

PCIe version2.05
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G645T 0.80
Xeon E-2456 15.40
+1825%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G645T 1228
Xeon E-2456 23743
+1833%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 15.40
Recency 2 September 2012 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

Pentium G645T has 128.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2456, on the other hand, has a 1825% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Xeon E-2456 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G645T in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G645T is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2456 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G645T and Xeon E-2456, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G645T
Pentium G645T
Intel Xeon E-2456
Xeon E-2456

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 8 votes

Rate Pentium G645T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2456 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G645T or Xeon E-2456, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.