Xeon Gold 5318Y vs Pentium G632

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiencyno data12.02
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data87 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size32 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 September 2011 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

Pentium G632 has 153.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5318Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium G632 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5318Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G632 and Xeon Gold 5318Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G632
Pentium G632
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Xeon Gold 5318Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium G632 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G632 or Xeon Gold 5318Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.