Xeon Gold 6433N vs Pentium G5600
Primary details
Comparing Pentium G5600 and Xeon Gold 6433N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | no data |
| Release date | no data | 1 July 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium G5600 and Xeon Gold 6433N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 60 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 85 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G5600 and Xeon Gold 6433N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1151 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G5600 and Xeon Gold 6433N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Pentium G5600 and Xeon Gold 6433N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G5600 and Xeon Gold 6433N are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G5600 and Xeon Gold 6433N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G5600 and Xeon Gold 6433N.
| PCIe version | no data | 4 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 205 Watt |
Pentium G5600 has 302% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6433N, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Pentium G5600 and Xeon Gold 6433N. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium G5600 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6433N is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G5600 and Xeon Gold 6433N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
