Core i5-11300H vs Pentium G3460
Aggregate performance score
i5-11300H outperforms Pentium G3460 by a whopping 390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium G3460 and Core i5-11300H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2109 | 946 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.21 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Tiger Lake-H35 |
| Release date | 21 July 2014 (9 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium G3460 and Core i5-11300H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 5 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | 146.1 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G3460 and Core i5-11300H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1150 | BGA1449/LGA1449 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3460 and Core i5-11300H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium G3460 and Core i5-11300H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3460 and Core i5-11300H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3460 and Core i5-11300H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD (Haswell) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3460 and Core i5-11300H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-11300H outperforms Pentium G3460 by 390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-11300H outperforms Pentium G3460 by 390% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-11300H outperforms Pentium G3460 by 174% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-11300H outperforms Pentium G3460 by 367% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.44 | 7.06 |
| Recency | 21 July 2014 | 11 January 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 35 Watt |
i5-11300H has a 390.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 54.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-11300H is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G3460 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium G3460 is a desktop processor while Core i5-11300H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3460 and Core i5-11300H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
