Xeon W-3275M vs Pentium G3258

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G3258
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.34
Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.75
+1822%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Pentium G3258 by a whopping 1822% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2159171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.122.52
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date2 June 2014 (10 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$77$7,453
Current price$135 (1.8x MSRP)$9030 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3275M has 2000% better value for money than Pentium G3258.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1.75 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)28 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)38.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °C76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size32 GB2 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe versionUp to 3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G3258 1.34
Xeon W-3275M 25.75
+1822%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Pentium G3258 by 1822% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium G3258 2076
Xeon W-3275M 39834
+1819%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Pentium G3258 by 1819% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium G3258 616
Xeon W-3275M 1203
+95.3%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Pentium G3258 by 95% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium G3258 1079
Xeon W-3275M 11736
+988%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Pentium G3258 by 988% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.34 25.75
Recency 2 June 2014 3 June 2019
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Cost $77 $7453
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G3258 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G3258 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3258 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G3258
Pentium G3258
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 58 votes

Rate Pentium G3258 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 62 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G3258 or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.