Xeon Silver 4510 vs Pentium G2120
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Silver 4510 outperforms Pentium G2120 by a whopping 1701% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium G2120 and Xeon Silver 4510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2340 | 246 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.07 | 100.00 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 2.06 | 13.57 |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 3 September 2012 (12 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $88 | $563 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Silver 4510 has 142757% better value for money than Pentium G2120.
Detailed specifications
Pentium G2120 and Xeon Silver 4510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 94 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 84 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G2120 and Xeon Silver 4510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA1155 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G2120 and Xeon Silver 4510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| My WiFi | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Pentium G2120 and Xeon Silver 4510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | - | no data |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G2120 and Xeon Silver 4510 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G2120 and Xeon Silver 4510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC) |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors | N/A |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G2120 and Xeon Silver 4510 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G2120 and Xeon Silver 4510.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.24 | 22.33 |
| Recency | 3 September 2012 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 150 Watt |
Pentium G2120 has 172.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon Silver 4510, on the other hand, has a 1700.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
The Xeon Silver 4510 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G2120 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium G2120 is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4510 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G2120 and Xeon Silver 4510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
