Apple M1 Max vs Pentium G2120

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G2120
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
1.19
Apple M1 Max
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
13.91
+1069%

Apple M1 Max outperforms Pentium G2120 by a whopping 1069% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G2120 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2357534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiency2.05no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)no data
Release date3 September 2012 (12 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$88no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G2120 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads210
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2.9 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)28 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G2120 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155no data
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G2120 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Pentium G2120 and Apple M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G2120 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G2120 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G2120 and Apple M1 Max integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G2120 and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G2120 1.19
Apple M1 Max 13.91
+1069%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G2120 1896
Apple M1 Max 22098
+1066%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 13.91
Recency 3 September 2012 18 October 2021
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 10
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 Max has a 1068.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G2120 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G2120 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G2120 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G2120
Pentium G2120
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 93 votes

Rate Pentium G2120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 692 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G2120 or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.