Celeron N2815 vs Pentium G2010

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2449not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.72no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date21 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$466$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3072 KB (shared)1 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1066
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz756 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G2010 1599
+223%
Celeron N2815 495

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium G2010 441
+196%
Celeron N2815 149

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium G2010 644
+161%
Celeron N2815 247

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2013 1 December 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron N2815 has an age advantage of 10 months, and 685.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium G2010 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2815 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G2010 and Celeron N2815, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G2010
Pentium G2010
Intel Celeron N2815
Celeron N2815

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 92 votes

Rate Pentium G2010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate Celeron N2815 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G2010 or Celeron N2815, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.