Microsoft SQ1 vs Pentium E6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E6600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.72

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms Pentium E6600 by a whopping 413% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E6600 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25901418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataQualcomm Snapdragon
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date17 January 2010 (14 years ago)2 October 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$16no data
Current price$73 (4.6x MSRP)$1873

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium E6600 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed3.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V – 1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E6600 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E6600 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Pentium E6600 and Microsoft SQ1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E6600 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E6600 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataQualcomm Adreno 685

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E6600 and Microsoft SQ1.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E6600 0.72
Microsoft SQ1 3.69
+413%

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms Pentium E6600 by 413% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium E6600 1121
Microsoft SQ1 5704
+409%

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms Pentium E6600 by 409% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 3.69
Recency 17 January 2010 2 October 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm

The Microsoft SQ1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E6600 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium E6600 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E6600 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E6600
Pentium E6600
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 160 votes

Rate Pentium E6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 51 vote

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E6600 or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.