Xeon w5-2445 vs Pentium E5800
Aggregate performance score
Xeon w5-2445 outperforms Pentium E5800 by a whopping 2632% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium E5800 and Xeon w5-2445 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2680 | 279 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.38 | 61.75 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.08 | 10.94 |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 28 November 2010 (14 years ago) | 15 February 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $68 | $839 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon w5-2445 has 1048% better value for money than Pentium E5800.
Detailed specifications
Pentium E5800 and Xeon w5-2445 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 26.25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium E5800 and Xeon w5-2445 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 175 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5800 and Xeon w5-2445. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Pentium E5800 and Xeon w5-2445 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5800 and Xeon w5-2445 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5800 and Xeon w5-2445. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5800 and Xeon w5-2445.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.74 | 20.22 |
| Recency | 28 November 2010 | 15 February 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
| Threads | 2 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 175 Watt |
Pentium E5800 has 169.2% lower power consumption.
Xeon w5-2445, on the other hand, has a 2632.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads.
The Xeon w5-2445 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E5800 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium E5800 is a desktop processor while Xeon w5-2445 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5800 and Xeon w5-2445, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
