C-60 vs Pentium Dual Core T4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T4500 and C-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2439not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreAMD C-Series
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)22 August 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$350 $189

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T4500 and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size107 mm275 mm2
Number of transistors410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T4500 and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPFT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T4500 and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T4500 and C-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T4500 and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6290

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium Dual T4500 1336
+328%
C-60 312

Pentium Dual Core T4500 outperforms C-60 by 328% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium Dual T4500 2331
+204%
C-60 768

Pentium Dual Core T4500 outperforms C-60 by 204% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium Dual T4500 4337
+192%
C-60 1483

Pentium Dual Core T4500 outperforms C-60 by 192% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium Dual T4500 1898
+152%
C-60 753

Pentium Dual Core T4500 outperforms C-60 by 152% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pentium Dual T4500 35.7
+141%
C-60 86.15

C-60 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T4500 by 141% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pentium Dual T4500 1
+184%
C-60 0

Pentium Dual Core T4500 outperforms C-60 by 184% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2010 22 August 2011
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 9 Watt

We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T4500 and C-60. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T4500 and C-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
Pentium Dual Core T4500
AMD C-60
C-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 396 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 213 votes

Rate C-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T4500 or C-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.