Celeron D 330 vs Pentium Dual T4300
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron D 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2625 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Pentium Dual Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.11 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Prescott (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | June 2004 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron D 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 109 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 67 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 million | 125 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.25V-1.4V |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron D 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | P | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 73 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron D 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron D 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron D 330 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron D 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 73 Watt |
Pentium Dual T4300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 108.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron D 330. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T4300 is a notebook processor while Celeron D 330 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron D 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
