Phenom II X3 P820 vs Pentium Dual T3400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T3400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
Phenom II X3 P820
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 25 Watt
0.66
+57.1%

Phenom II X3 P820 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T3400 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X3 P820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29902754
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual Core3x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency1.142.50
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X3 P820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache1 MB1.5 MB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X3 P820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X3 P820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a)
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X3 P820 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X3 P820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Dual T3400 0.42
Phenom II X3 P820 0.66
+57.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium Dual T3400 2026
+29.9%
Phenom II X3 P820 1560

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium Dual T3400 3817
Phenom II X3 P820 4169
+9.2%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium Dual T3400 1779
Phenom II X3 P820 2043
+14.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.66
Recency 1 October 2008 12 May 2010
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Phenom II X3 P820 has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X3 P820 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T3400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Phenom II X3 P820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400
Pentium Dual Core T3400
AMD Phenom II X3 P820
Phenom II X3 P820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 65 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 48 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 P820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T3400 or Phenom II X3 P820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.