Pentium Dual T3400 vs Phenom II X3 N830

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X3 N830
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
+66.7%
Pentium Dual Core T3400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42

Phenom II X3 N830 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T3400 by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X3 N830 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27212990
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series3x AMD Phenom IIIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency1.891.14
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X3 N830 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads32
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.16 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz667 MHz
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X3 N830 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Pentium Dual Core T3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-Vno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Pentium Dual Core T3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 N830 and Pentium Dual Core T3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X3 N830 0.70
+66.7%
Pentium Dual T3400 0.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X3 N830 1107
+67%
Pentium Dual T3400 663

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Phenom II X3 N830 1817
Pentium Dual T3400 2026
+11.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Phenom II X3 N830 4954
+29.8%
Pentium Dual T3400 3817

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Phenom II X3 N830 2412
+35.6%
Pentium Dual T3400 1779

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Phenom II X3 N830 24.7
+55.9%
Pentium Dual T3400 38.5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.42
Recency 12 May 2010 1 October 2008
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Phenom II X3 N830 has a 66.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Phenom II X3 N830 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T3400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 N830 and Pentium Dual Core T3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X3 N830
Phenom II X3 N830
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400
Pentium Dual Core T3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 37 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 65 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X3 N830 or Pentium Dual Core T3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.