Xeon 3.06 vs Pentium Dual T2410

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T2410 and Xeon 3.06 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual Coreno data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Gallatin (2003−2004)
Release date1 September 2008 (16 years ago)March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T2410 and Xeon 3.06 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.07 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data16K
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die size111 mm2237 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data286 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T2410 and Xeon 3.06 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketP, 478Pin604
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt97 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T2410 566
+6.2%
Xeon 3.06 533

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 97 Watt

Pentium Dual T2410 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 177.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T2410 and Xeon 3.06. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T2410 is a notebook processor while Xeon 3.06 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T2410 and Xeon 3.06, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410
Pentium Dual Core T2410
Intel Xeon 3.06
Xeon 3.06

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 9 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T2410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon 3.06 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T2410 or Xeon 3.06, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.