Turion 64 MK-36 vs Pentium Dual T2310

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T2310
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.33
+57.1%
Turion 64 MK-36
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.21

Pentium Dual Core T2310 outperforms Turion 64 MK-36 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T2310 and Turion 64 MK-36 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30683207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium Dual CoreTurion 64
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Richmond
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T2310 and Turion 64 MK-36 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz800 MHz
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T2310 and Turion 64 MK-36 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt31 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Dual T2310 0.33
+57.1%
Turion 64 MK-36 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T2310 531
+59%
Turion 64 MK-36 334

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 0.21
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 31 Watt

Pentium Dual T2310 has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Turion 64 MK-36, on the other hand, has 12.9% lower power consumption.

The Pentium Dual Core T2310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MK-36 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T2310 and Turion 64 MK-36, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310
Pentium Dual Core T2310
AMD Turion 64 MK-36
Turion 64 MK-36

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 16 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T2310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Turion 64 MK-36 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T2310 or Turion 64 MK-36, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.