Microsoft SQ1 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2180
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Dual-Core E2180 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1476 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Architecture codename | Allendale (2006−2009) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | August 2007 (17 years ago) | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual-Core E2180 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 77 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 105 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual-Core E2180 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual-Core E2180 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual-Core E2180 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
Microsoft SQ1 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual-Core E2180 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium Dual-Core E2180 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual-Core E2180 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
