Microsoft SQ1 vs Pentium D 820

Primary details

Comparing Pentium D 820 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	1482
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	Pentium D	Qualcomm Snapdragon
Power efficiency	no data	0.12
Architecture codename	Smithfield (2005)	Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date	May 2005 (19 years ago)	2 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium D 820 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	2	8
Base clock speed	2.8 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.8 GHz	3 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	28 KB	no data
L2 cache	2 MB	no data
L3 cache	0 KB	2 MB
Chip lithography	90 nm	7 nm
Die size	206 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	64 °C	no data
Number of transistors	169 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.2V-1.4V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium D 820 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	no data
Socket	PLGA775	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	3000 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 820 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Pentium D 820 and Microsoft SQ1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 820 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	-	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 820 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Qualcomm Adreno 685

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	2	8
Threads	2	8
Chip lithography	90 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	3000 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium D 820 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---