A8-3800 vs Pentium 4 P4 3.0

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A8-3800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2273
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesPentium 4no data
Power efficiencyno data1.88
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Llano (2011−2012)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)30 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A8-3800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A8-3800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFM1
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A8-3800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A8-3800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6550D

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 65 Watt

A8-3800 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 36.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A8-3800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A8-3800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 P4 3.0
Pentium 4 P4 3.0
AMD A8-3800
A8-3800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 281 vote

Rate Pentium 4 P4 3.0 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 70 votes

Rate A8-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 P4 3.0 or A8-3800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.