VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 vs Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Primary Details
Comparing Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium 4-M | C7-M |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2001−2004) | Esther |
| Release date | no data | no data |
| Current price | $49 | $244 |
Detailed Specifications
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus support | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 5 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 outperforms VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 by 204% in 3DMark06 CPU.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 outperforms VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 by 1% in wPrime 32.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 5 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
