Celeron 667 vs Pentium 4 HT 631

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 HT 631 and Celeron 667 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameCedar Mill (2006)Timna
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 HT 631 and Celeron 667 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.67 GHz
L1 cache28 KB32 KB
L2 cache2 MB128 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die size81 mm2129 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors188 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 HT 631 and Celeron 667 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket775370S
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt30 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 HT 631 and Celeron 667. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel i752

Pros & cons summary


Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 30 Watt

Pentium 4 HT 631 has 100% more threads, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 667, on the other hand, has 186.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 HT 631 and Celeron 667. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 HT 631 and Celeron 667, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 HT 631
Pentium 4 HT 631
Intel Celeron 667
Celeron 667

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 81 vote

Rate Pentium 4 HT 631 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 667 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 HT 631 or Celeron 667, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.