Pentium 4 P4 3.0 vs Pentium 4 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 630 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesPentium 4Pentium 4
Architecture codenamePrescott 2MNorthwood (2002−2004)
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 630 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz400 MHz
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 630 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Pentium 4 630 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium 4 630 103
Pentium 4 P4 3.0 97
+6.2%

Pros & cons summary


Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 89 Watt

Pentium 4 630 has 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 630 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630
Intel Pentium 4 P4 3.0
Pentium 4 P4 3.0

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 122 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 278 votes

Rate Pentium 4 P4 3.0 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 630 or Pentium 4 P4 3.0, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.