Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Pentium 4 560

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 4 560
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 88 Watt
0.21
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.04
+8490%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Pentium 4 560 by a whopping 8490% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 7 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3229337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesPentium 4no data
Power efficiency0.2349.15
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release dateno dataJanuary 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 7 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache16 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size109 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors125 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 7 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket775FP8
Power consumption (TDP)88 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 7 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 7 7840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 7 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 7 7840HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 4 560 0.21
Ryzen 7 7840HS 18.04
+8490%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium 4 560 85
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2.64
+3120%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 18.04
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 88 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840HS has a 8490.5% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 151.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 560 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium 4 560 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 7 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 560
Pentium 4 560
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 17 votes

Rate Pentium 4 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1755 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 560 or Ryzen 7 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.