Celeron M 370 vs Pentium 4 2.4 GHz
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and Celeron M 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium 4 | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2001−2004) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus support | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 59.8 Watt | 21 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and Celeron M 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Pentium 4 2.4 GHz outperforms Celeron M 370 by 10% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 59 Watt | 21 Watt |
Celeron M 370 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 181% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and Celeron M 370. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium 4 2.4 GHz is a desktop processor while Celeron M 370 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and Celeron M 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
