Celeron 3865U vs Pentium 3825U

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pentium 3825U
2015
2 cores / 4 threads
0.90
+5.9%
Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads
0.85

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24072440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)Kaby Lake-U
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$107
Current price$90 (0.6x MSRP)$296 (2.8x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size82 mm298.7 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPPno data-
Smart Response-+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPXno data+
Identity Protection+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency850 MHz900 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1212
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1210

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3825U 0.90
+5.9%
Celeron 3865U 0.85

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium 3825U 1389
+5.5%
Celeron 3865U 1316

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 6% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium 3825U 318
Celeron 3865U 392
+23.3%

Celeron 3865U outperforms Pentium 3825U by 23% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium 3825U 641
Celeron 3865U 691
+7.8%

Celeron 3865U outperforms Pentium 3825U by 8% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium 3825U 2951
+3.4%
Celeron 3865U 2853

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium 3825U 6537
+20.5%
Celeron 3865U 5425

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 20% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pentium 3825U 25.41
+54.9%
Celeron 3865U 39.36

Celeron 3865U outperforms Pentium 3825U by 55% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pentium 3825U 2
+28.3%
Celeron 3865U 2

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 28% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium 3825U 190
+33.8%
Celeron 3865U 142

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 34% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium 3825U 77
+6.9%
Celeron 3865U 72

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 7% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pentium 3825U 0.9
+4.7%
Celeron 3865U 0.86

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 5% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium 3825U 0.2
Celeron 3865U 0.8
+286%

Celeron 3865U outperforms Pentium 3825U by 286% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium 3825U 1782
+60.8%
Celeron 3865U 1108

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 61% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium 3825U 63
+14.9%
Celeron 3865U 54

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 15% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium 3825U 12
+10.6%
Celeron 3865U 11

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 11% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium 3825U 1602
Celeron 3865U 1843
+15%

Celeron 3865U outperforms Pentium 3825U by 15% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium 3825U 3540
+9.8%
Celeron 3865U 3224

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 10% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium 3825U 3998
+10.2%
Celeron 3865U 3627

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 10% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.90 0.85
Recency 1 March 2015 3 January 2017
Threads 4 2
Cost $161 $107

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3825U and Celeron 3865U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3825U
Pentium 3825U
Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 64 votes

Rate Pentium 3825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 96 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3825U or Celeron 3865U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.