A9-9410 vs PRO A8-9600B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A8-9600B
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.48
+49.5%

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A8-9600B and A9-9410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20722382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Current priceno data$722

Detailed specifications

PRO A8-9600B and A9-9410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on PRO A8-9600B and A9-9410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A8-9600B and A9-9410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX+
FRTC11
FreeSync11
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A8-9600B and A9-9410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A8-9600B and A9-9410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4-1866DDR4-2133
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count63
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A8-9600B and A9-9410 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A8-9600B and A9-9410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A8-9600B and A9-9410.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes88

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A8-9600B 1.48
+49.5%
A9-9410 0.99

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

PRO A8-9600B 2292
+50.1%
A9-9410 1527

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 50% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

PRO A8-9600B 2336
A9-9410 2694
+15.3%

A9-9410 outperforms PRO A8-9600B by 15% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

PRO A8-9600B 5703
+23.5%
A9-9410 4619

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

PRO A8-9600B 2930
+19.3%
A9-9410 2455

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 19% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

PRO A8-9600B 16.76
+42.9%
A9-9410 23.95

A9-9410 outperforms PRO A8-9600B by 43% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

PRO A8-9600B 2
+50.9%
A9-9410 2

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 51% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

PRO A8-9600B 203
+56.2%
A9-9410 130

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 56% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

PRO A8-9600B 71
+12.7%
A9-9410 63

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 13% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

PRO A8-9600B 0.84
+2.4%
A9-9410 0.82

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 2% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A8-9600B 1.5
+50%
A9-9410 1

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 50% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A8-9600B 1444
+64.3%
A9-9410 879

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 64% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A8-9600B 13
+31.5%
A9-9410 10

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 31% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A8-9600B 70
+30.8%
A9-9410 54

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 31% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO A8-9600B 4764
+44.4%
A9-9410 3299

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 44% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO A8-9600B 1965
A9-9410 2134
+8.6%

A9-9410 outperforms PRO A8-9600B by 9% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO A8-9600B 5124
+20.3%
A9-9410 4260

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 20% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

PRO A8-9600B 4389
+37.9%
A9-9410 3182

PRO A8-9600B outperforms A9-9410 by 38% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

PRO A8-9600B 1991
A9-9410 2133
+7.1%

A9-9410 outperforms PRO A8-9600B by 7% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 0.99
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

The PRO A8-9600B is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A8-9600B and A9-9410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A8-9600B
PRO A8-9600B
AMD A9-9410
A9-9410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 17 votes

Rate PRO A8-9600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 111 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A8-9600B or A9-9410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.