Atom D525 vs PRO A8-9600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

PRO A8-9600
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.89
+722%

PRO A8-9600 outperforms Atom D525 by a whopping 722% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21923473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.230.75
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date3 October 2016 (9 years ago)21 June 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63

Detailed specifications

PRO A8-9600 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size250 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A8-9600 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A8-9600 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

PRO A8-9600 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A8-9600 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A8-9600 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel GMA 3150
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A8-9600 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A8-9600 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A8-9600 and Atom D525.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

PRO A8-9600 1.89
+722%
Atom D525 0.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

PRO A8-9600 3318
+725%
Samples: 44
Atom D525 402
Samples: 333

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 0.23
Recency 3 October 2016 21 June 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 13 Watt

PRO A8-9600 has a 721.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The AMD PRO A8-9600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D525 in performance tests.

Note that PRO A8-9600 is a desktop processor while Atom D525 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A8-9600
PRO A8-9600
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 38 votes

Rate PRO A8-9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 280 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors PRO A8-9600 and Atom D525, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.