A6-9500E vs Atom D525

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D525
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.25
A6-9500E
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.09
+336%

A6-9500E outperforms Atom D525 by a whopping 336% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D525 and A6-9500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31622418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency1.822.95
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date21 June 2010 (14 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D525 and A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size66 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors176 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D525 and A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559AM4
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D525 and A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D525 and A6-9500E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D525 and A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D525 and A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D525 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom D525 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D525 and A6-9500E.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D525 0.25
A6-9500E 1.09
+336%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D525 404
A6-9500E 1725
+327%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 1.09
Recency 21 June 2010 27 July 2017
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 35 Watt

Atom D525 has 100% more threads, and 169.2% lower power consumption.

A6-9500E, on the other hand, has a 336% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The A6-9500E is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D525 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom D525 is a notebook processor while A6-9500E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D525 and A6-9500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D525
Atom D525
AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 218 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 49 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D525 or A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.