Sempron 3850 vs PRO A8-8650B

VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A8-8650B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.02
+181%
Sempron 3850
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.72

PRO A8-8650B outperforms Sempron 3850 by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A8-8650B and Sempron 3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19122679
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.942.73
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date29 September 2015 (9 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A8-8650B and Sempron 3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache4096 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C90 °C
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on PRO A8-8650B and Sempron 3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A8-8650B and Sempron 3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect++
RAID+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A8-8650B and Sempron 3850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A8-8650B and Sempron 3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-1600
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384128
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A8-8650B and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A8-8650B and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A8-8650B and Sempron 3850.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A8-8650B 2.02
+181%
Sempron 3850 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A8-8650B 3208
+179%
Sempron 3850 1150

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

PRO A8-8650B 436
+173%
Sempron 3850 160

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

PRO A8-8650B 1020
+90.7%
Sempron 3850 535

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 0.72
Recency 29 September 2015 9 April 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 25 Watt

PRO A8-8650B has a 180.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Sempron 3850, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

The PRO A8-8650B is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A8-8650B and Sempron 3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A8-8650B
PRO A8-8650B
AMD Sempron 3850
Sempron 3850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 147 votes

Rate PRO A8-8650B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Sempron 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A8-8650B or Sempron 3850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.