GX-210JA vs PRO A8-8650B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1812not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2018)Temash (2013)
Release date29 September 2015 (8 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Current priceno data$449

Detailed specifications

PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+FT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3-1066 Memory Controller
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID+no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

PRO A8-8650B 3211
+1195%
GX-210JA 248

PRO A8-8650B outperforms GX-210JA by 1195% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2015 23 May 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

We couldn't decide between PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that PRO A8-8650B is a desktop processor while GX-210JA is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A8-8650B and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A8-8650B
PRO A8-8650B
AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 118 votes

Rate PRO A8-8650B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 3 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A8-8650B or GX-210JA, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.