Atom N270 vs PRO A8-8650B

VS

Primary details

Comparing PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1912not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.94no data
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date29 September 2015 (9 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$44

Detailed specifications

PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cacheno data56 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size245 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2+PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphics-
iGPU core count6-
Number of pipelines384-
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12-
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A8-8650B 3208
+2259%
Atom N270 136

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2015 2 April 2008
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 2 Watt

PRO A8-8650B has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has 3150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that PRO A8-8650B is a desktop processor while Atom N270 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A8-8650B and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A8-8650B
PRO A8-8650B
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 147 votes

Rate PRO A8-8650B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 225 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A8-8650B or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.