A8-4500M vs PRO A6-9500E
Aggregate performance score
A8-4500M outperforms PRO A6-9500E by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2426 | 2417 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD A-Series |
| Power efficiency | 2.84 | 2.87 |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 3 October 2016 (8 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FS1r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| Out-of-band client management | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | unknown |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 7640G (496 - 685 MHz) |
| iGPU core count | 4 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.05 | 1.06 |
| Recency | 3 October 2016 | 15 May 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
PRO A6-9500E has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.
A8-4500M, on the other hand, has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M.
Note that PRO A6-9500E is a desktop processor while A8-4500M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A6-9500E and A8-4500M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
