Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs PRO A12-9800B

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

PRO A12-9800B
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.74
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads
4.31
+148%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 148% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing PRO A12-9800B and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19141267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date1 June 2016 (7 years ago)26 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price$676 $611

Detailed Specifications

PRO A12-9800B and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800B and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800B and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4no data
AVXAVX+
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800B and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800B and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4-1866DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800B and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800B and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800B and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes812

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A12-9800B 1.74
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4.31
+148%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 148% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

PRO A12-9800B 2691
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6660
+147%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 147% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

PRO A12-9800B 545
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 892
+63.7%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 64% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

PRO A12-9800B 1157
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2565
+122%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 122% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

PRO A12-9800B 2593
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4349
+67.8%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 68% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

PRO A12-9800B 7056
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 14336
+103%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 103% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

PRO A12-9800B 3249
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 5635
+73.4%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 73% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

PRO A12-9800B 13.8
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12.36
+11.7%

PRO A12-9800B outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by 12% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

PRO A12-9800B 3
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6
+135%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 135% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

PRO A12-9800B 225
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 553
+146%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 146% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

PRO A12-9800B 75
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 134
+78.7%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 79% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

PRO A12-9800B 0.88
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 1.55
+76.1%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 76% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 1.8
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3.4
+88.9%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 89% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 1383
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2700
+95.2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 95% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 77
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 98
+26.9%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 27% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 17
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 34
+106%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 106% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO A12-9800B 2031
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3326
+63.8%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 64% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO A12-9800B 5326
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12422
+133%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 133% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO A12-9800B 5705
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 11156
+95.5%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 96% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

PRO A12-9800B 4453
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 9760
+119%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 119% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

PRO A12-9800B 2073
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3480
+67.9%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 68% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.74 4.31
Integrated graphics card 4.49
Recency 1 June 2016 26 October 2017
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A12-9800B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-9800B and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-9800B
PRO A12-9800B
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 24 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 82 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-9800B or Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.