Atom D510 vs PRO A12-9800B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A12-9800B
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.55
+574%

PRO A12-9800B outperforms Atom D510 by a whopping 574% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23653477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency4.360.75
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)21 December 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$97

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-9800B and Atom D510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.67 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size250 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800B and Atom D510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800B and Atom D510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

PRO A12-9800B and Atom D510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800B and Atom D510 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800B and Atom D510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800B and Atom D510 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800B and Atom D510 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800B and Atom D510.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

PRO A12-9800B 1.55
+574%
Atom D510 0.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

PRO A12-9800B 2705
+566%
Samples: 71
Atom D510 406
Samples: 63

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 0.23
Recency 1 June 2016 21 December 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

PRO A12-9800B has a 573.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D510, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.

The AMD PRO A12-9800B is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D510 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 26 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 62 votes

Rate Atom D510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors PRO A12-9800B and Atom D510, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.