UHD Graphics 630 vs PRO A12-8870
Primary details
Comparing PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1755 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Power efficiency | 3.55 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Gen9.5 |
| Release date | October 2016 (8 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 4 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 0.35 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | no data |
| iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
| Enduro | n/a | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | n/a | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
UHD Graphics 630 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that PRO A12-8870 is a desktop processor while UHD Graphics 630 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-8870 and UHD Graphics 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
