Celeron J4105 vs PRO A10-8770

VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-8770
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.25
+23%
Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.83

PRO A10-8770 outperforms Celeron J4105 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18322010
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.09
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.2817.32
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)11 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplierno data15
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2048 KB4 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm293 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 600
iGPU core count6no data
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Switchable graphics+-
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortn/a+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
OpenGLno data4.4
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8770 2.25
+23%
Celeron J4105 1.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A10-8770 3574
+23.3%
Celeron J4105 2899

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.25 1.83
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

PRO A10-8770 has a 23% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron J4105, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

The PRO A10-8770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8770 and Celeron J4105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-8770
PRO A10-8770
Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 115 votes

Rate PRO A10-8770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 311 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-8770 or Celeron J4105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.