Celeron N6211 vs PRO A10-8750B

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8750B and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1902	2092
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.19	3.51
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	no data	Elkhart Lake
Architecture codename	Godaveri (2014−2018)	Elkhart Lake
Release date	29 September 2015 (8 years ago)	17 July 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$54
Current price	$190	$240 (4.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron N6211 has 1747% better value for money than PRO A10-8750B.

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8750B and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	3.6 GHz	1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	3 GHz
L2 cache	4096 KB	1.5 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Die size	245 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	no data
Number of transistors	2,411 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	no data	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8750B and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FM2+	BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8750B and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
FRTC	1	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
PowerNow	+	no data
PowerGating	+	no data
Out-of-band client management	+	no data
VirusProtect	+	no data
RAID	+	no data
HSA	1	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8750B and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
IOMMU 2.0	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8750B and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-2133	DDR4
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
iGPU core count	8	no data
Number of pipelines	512	no data
Enduro	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data
UVD	+	no data
VCE	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8750B and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8750B and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	1	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8750B and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8750B outperforms Celeron N6211 by 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.86	1.45
Recency	29 September 2015	17 July 2022
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	6 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8750B and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---