Opteron X1150 vs Opteron 6386 SE
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 6386 SE and Opteron X1150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1186 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.47 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 3.53 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Abu Dhabi (2012) | Kyoto (2013) |
| Release date | 5 November 2012 (12 years ago) | 29 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,408 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6386 SE and Opteron X1150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6386 SE and Opteron X1150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Opteron X1150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Opteron X1150 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Opteron X1150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Opteron X1150.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 November 2012 | 29 May 2013 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 17 Watt |
Opteron 6386 SE has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Opteron X1150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 723.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 6386 SE and Opteron X1150. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6386 SE and Opteron X1150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
