Xeon X7350 vs E5-2620 v3

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2620 v3
2014
6 cores / 12 threads
5.05

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon X7350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11241120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation3.012.22
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)no data
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)1 July 2007 (16 years ago)
Current price$43 $75

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 has 36% better value for money than Xeon X7350.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon X7350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)no data
Threads12no data
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache15 MB (shared)8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C66 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon X7350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011PGA604,PPGA604
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon X7350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon X7350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon X7350 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon X7350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon X7350.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 5.05
Xeon X7350 5.07
+0.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2620 v3 7806
Xeon X7350 7836
+0.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 5.05 5.07
Recency 8 September 2014 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 130 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon X7350.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v3 and Xeon X7350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Intel Xeon X7350
Xeon X7350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2566 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Xeon X7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v3 or Xeon X7350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.