Xeon Silver 4216 vs Opteron 6278

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6278
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.88
Xeon Silver 4216
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 100 Watt
13.33
+50.1%

Xeon Silver 4216 outperforms Opteron 6278 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6278 and Xeon Silver 4216 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking796521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.518.14
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Silver
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,002
Current price$597 $1626 (1.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4216 has 132% better value for money than Opteron 6278.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6278 and Xeon Silver 4216 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache768 KB1 MB
L2 cache16 MB16 MB
L3 cache8 MB (per die)22 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size316 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data79 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6278 and Xeon Silver 4216 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration42 (Multiprocessor)
SocketG34FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon Silver 4216. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Opteron 6278 and Xeon Silver 4216 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon Silver 4216 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon Silver 4216. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data115.212 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon Silver 4216.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6278 8.88
Xeon Silver 4216 13.33
+50.1%

Xeon Silver 4216 outperforms Opteron 6278 by 50% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Opteron 6278 13733
Xeon Silver 4216 20613
+50.1%

Xeon Silver 4216 outperforms Opteron 6278 by 50% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.88 13.33
Recency 1 May 2012 2 April 2019
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 100 Watt

The Xeon Silver 4216 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6278 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6278 and Xeon Silver 4216, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278
Intel Xeon Silver 4216
Xeon Silver 4216

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 10 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6278 or Xeon Silver 4216, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.