Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Opteron 6276

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6276
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
4.07
Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
11.80
+190%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms Opteron 6276 by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6276 and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1414669
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.14no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency3.2931.31
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Rembrandt-R (2023)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6276 and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.55 GHz
L1 cache768 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size316 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6276 and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34FP7
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6276 4.07
Ryzen 5 7535HS 11.80
+190%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6276 6348
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18386
+190%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Opteron 6276 357
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1761
+393%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Opteron 6276 2441
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6940
+184%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.07 11.80
Recency 14 November 2011 4 January 2023
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 35 Watt

Opteron 6276 has 166.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has a 189.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 228.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7535HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6276 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6276 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6276
Opteron 6276
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 51 vote

Rate Opteron 6276 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1358 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6276 or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.