Celeron M 925 vs Opteron 6276
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 6276 and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1414 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.14 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 3.29 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $70 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6276 and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 316 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6276 and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | no data |
| Socket | G34 | PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and Celeron M 925 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and Celeron M 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and Celeron M 925.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 1 January 2011 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 35 Watt |
Opteron 6276 has an age advantage of 10 months, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 925, on the other hand, has 228.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 6276 and Celeron M 925. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 6276 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 925 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
