Atom x3-3205RK vs Opteron 6276
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 6276 and Atom x3-3205RK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1386 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.49 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Silvermont (2015) |
Release date | 14 November 2011 (12 years ago) | 2 March 2015 (9 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6276 and Atom x3-3205RK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 768 KB | 56K (per core) |
L2 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 316 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 2,400 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6276 and Atom x3-3205RK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
Socket | G34 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and Atom x3-3205RK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 6276 and Atom x3-3205RK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and Atom x3-3205RK are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and Atom x3-3205RK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2, DDR3 1333 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Mali-450 MP4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and Atom x3-3205RK.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 14 November 2011 | 2 March 2015 |
Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
Threads | 16 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 2 Watt |
Opteron 6276 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Atom x3-3205RK, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 5650% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 6276 and Atom x3-3205RK. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 6276 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x3-3205RK is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and Atom x3-3205RK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.